Re: wi patch
"Bruce A. Mah" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If memory serves me right, M. Warner Losh wrote: > These patches make my lucent cards almost useful They are in 1Mbps > mode, it seems, but at least they work with a fair amount of > reliability. Don't try to set the media just yet. Hi Warner-- I'm almost hesitant to post this, but I tried this patch, and a Lucent WaveLan Silver card that I have is still a paperweight. I'm running CURRENT (GENERIC kernel) from 6 March on an IBM ThinkPad T21. This includes if_wi.c 1.130 and if_wivar.h 1.15. The card probes like this (copied by hand, so transcription errors are possible): wi0: <WaveLAN/IEEE> at port 0x100-0x13f irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 wi0: 802.11 address: 00:02:2d:2b:93:12 wi0: using Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (6.16.1) wi0: supported rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 0x0002; event status 0x0080 wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 0x0000; event status 0x0080 wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear. To me, it looks like the patch (which applied cleanly) had no effect. Can I do something else to help fix this? Thanks! Bruce.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+bR5O2MoxcVugUsMRAr50AKCdJtdep2vK2HgcEyUrJihZFooewQCgidLr a8LmpjgaXHU0bzTY4xxp62w= =1yDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----