Re: wi patch
"Bruce A. Mah" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If memory serves me right, Jason Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 03:22:54PM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > If memory serves me right, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > These patches make my lucent cards almost useful They are in 1Mbps > > > mode, it seems, but at least they work with a fair amount of > > > reliability. Don't try to set the media just yet. > > > > Hi Warner-- > > > > I'm almost hesitant to post this, but I tried this patch, and a > > Lucent WaveLan Silver card that I have is still a paperweight. > > Out of curiosity, what's so bad about these cards? I'll admit that I've > used nothing other than Lucent cards, but I don't find anything to > complain about with them. They seem to work fine talking to each other > and I can't complain about speeds or reliability of the signal. Maybe > it's just because I have nothing to compare them to? :) From my perspective, the problem is that they *were* working fine, but *now* mine isn't. (Right now, my card probes but is otherwise not useful for actually moving bits through the air.) When it was working, I had no complaints about mine either. :-) (Fortunately, I have a spare Aironet card.) Bruce.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+b9162MoxcVugUsMRArVhAKDE9jCtifmBA5OdmW0b/gx26rswdgCdHXi/ mYhAIQZC/qhrLzUdX37LUDI= =LSwz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----