Re: New Laptop: i810: HELP

John Utz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Umm, here's a really stupid and probably unworkable idea that i know 
absolutely nothing about :-)

there is something that i have read about called the 'framebuffer' 
driver, it's supposedly chipset independent. 

perhaps that is an avenue you could pursue?

the other point worth mentioning is that if you managed to get 320x200,
you probably can get at least 640x480 and maybe 800x600 by continuing to
fiddle about....

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:

> * Eric Anholt <[email protected]> [020429 19:54]:
> > On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 13:27, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > Well with that patch, we still get the same thing, but I suspect Eric
> > > did more than I did with the chips.
> > > 
> > > Eric,
> > >    I have the I830MG chipset in this laptop, and am willing to
> > > experiment and get it working on -STABLE. 
> > > 
> > >    I currently get a X86 Illegal opcode right after the Gamma Correction
> > > message in the logs (same as before applying your agp_i810.[ch] patch. 
> > > 
> > >    This is on a Fujitsu Lifebook C6651. 
> > 
> > Okay, I poked around in this, and I have to say that where it's going
> > wrong is totally out of my area of knowledge.  As far as I can tell,
> > it's dying because the bios memory seems to be corrupted, or at least
> > it's more than the emulator can handle according to Stuart Barkley. 
> > This is strange because Linux users have had it working.
> > 
> > Just to make see if this is an interaction with AGP (since the agp code
> > has not been successfully used yet that I know of), could you try
> > removing AGP from your kernel or not modloading it at boot and see how X
> > works?  It looks like X should handle not having AGP loaded, since you
> > have 8MB stolen for the card already.  If it does work, you'll be
> > limited in resolution, but not as badly as those who only have 512k or
> > 1MB stolen.
> Playing with it, I can get a 320x200 X up in VGA mode, if I don't 
> allow int10 to run.  As soon as we bring int10 in, we get the checksum
> (I suspect we have a mapping issue somewhere). 
> 
> Is there anything I can run to map the BIOS ROMS on the machine? 
> 
> What can I do to help? 
> 
> I'd LOVE to get it running, but I suspect the BIOS mapping into the
> system is the issue, and I don't know what the maps are. 
> 
> LER
> > 
> 
> 

-- 

John L. Utz III
[email protected]

Idiocy is the Impulse Function in the Convolution of Life


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.