Re: XFree86 won't run on 5.1 installed on Lifebook S-2020.
WiggTekMicro Corp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Organization | WiggTekMicro Corp |
| Message-ID | <1066753531.6841.22.camel@wiggtekmicrogate> |
I am glad that you made mention of that step, because I have done that countless times. The test always works, and XFree86 always starts that checkered screen, however, it always stops and indicates that there was a bad monitor name ":0" twice, and then gives me the bash prompt. I had Gnome working after the last message about changing the window manager, and then I actually tried to log out and start up a kde session. My laptop restarted fine, and then I got the same error messages from "startx" that I did before xfree86 was configured. Any help would be much appreciated. I can get the x-server to boot, when I manually edit the .new file, but never by directly editing the true XF86Config file. I always have to make my changes within the XF86Config.new file under the /root home. Any assistance with this is much appreciated. I don't understand why the e x-server is so unreliable in FreeBSD. I don't even have to configure it when installing and booting linux. In FreeBSD, the configuration gui seems to be toying with me, by making me go through all that configuration and then spitting out the same errors that I am getting now. And when I had GNOME up, I found that I had no applications other than those for administering gnome, or just the bare assentials. When I went to the bootup disk and tried to install things from ports collection, my laptop beeps and then nothing gets installed. Does anyone have a hint about that? When I tried to install the ports packages, I do remember that the / partion seemed to be full, however, that is not possible, since I have a 20GB partion and ports are usually installed under /usr. I did not install the partitions by hand. I used option A so that I did not have to take the extra time. Is this what might have caused the problem? Please let me know something. I am really disappointed with the way this OS works. I have been spouting the positives that FBSD and linux seem to have, but when it comes down to it, I find that a system that won't even run a simple graphic session reliably is not quite a great as I had hoped. I know that FreeBSD is not a user friendly as most other OS distobutions, but this is plain rediculous. Oh, I forgot the best part, I have the same issues when using a standard Gateway VX900 monitor, on my server at home. I still have redhat loaded on it, which I am sending these messages with, since I cannot even get bsd to run a graphic session reliably on either system. What is the deal guys????? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 2.6 KB) - not displayed