Re: ACPI/PCI-bus issue with compaq evo n160

Fredrik Lindberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I tried removing cbb and related stuff from the kernel, no luck.
The machine locks up just like before, output from db

http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/db.acpi-cbb-disabled

That db-output showed uchi still on irq10, so I disabled all usb-related stuff
from the kernel, and guess what, the machine booted with working acpi.
Some output with acpi enabled and cbb and uhci disabled

http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/db.acpi-cbb-uhci.disabled
http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/dmesg.acpi-cbb-uhci.disabled

I also tried to load the usb kernelmoduels (usbd) after boot but that hangs the machine and a show intrcnt says irq10: uhci1 3391124, same irq-storm.

   Fredrik


On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:47:32PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 12-Dec-2003 Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Thank you for your reply.
> > The information you requested is avaiable at
> > 
> > http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/db
> > http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/dmesg.acpi-pci.enabled
> > 
> >   Fredrik 
> 
> I think your problem is cbb(4) related.  Probably cbb(4) is using an
> address that conflicts with another device and thus it's interrupt
> (on irq 10) is never being handled and it storms.  Try removing 'cbb'
> from your kernel as a test.  Warner (cc'd) can help you find a memory
> region for your cbb(4) device that you can set using 'hw.cbb.start_memory'
> from the loader.
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:42:06PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> [ Resent due to NO.*SPAM bounce the first time ]
> >> 
> >> On 10-Dec-2003 Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > 
> >> > I have a Compaq evo n160 running 
> >> > FreeBSD biocandy 5.2-RC FreeBSD 5.2-RC #10: Mon Dec  8 19:08:38 CET 2003
> >> > 
> >> > The machine fails (and always has) to boot with acpi enabled 
> >> > (locks up when mounting /), however, I managed to find out that 
> >> > booting with the following option 
> >> > 
> >> > debug.acpi.disable="pci" 
> >> > 
> >> > in /boot/loader.conf made the machine boot correctly and acpi related 
> >> > functions such as battry monitoring worked just fine.
> >> > 
> >> > But, and a huge but, no pci devices are detected during boot 
> >> > (maybe quite obvious because of that debug option) 
> >> > All pci-devices works perfectly with acpi disabled.
> >> > 
> >> > Now, is there any chance to make freebsd use acpi and the 
> >> > "normal" pci-bus driver at the same time, overriding the 
> >> > acpi pci-bus implementation?
> >> > 
> >> > I believe linux has a kernel option called pci=noacpi (atleast acording to google),
> >> > which does this.
> >> > 
> >> > With acpi enabled scanpci reports all the pci devices, but pciconf -l
> >> > doesn't return anything.
> >> > With acpi disabled, scanpci reports all pci devices, pciconf -l 
> >> > reports all devices.
> >> > 
> >> > dmesg output with acpi enabled 
> >> > http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/dmesg.acpi.enabled
> >> > 
> >> > dmesg out with acpi disabled
> >> > http://shapeshifter.se/~fredde/tmp/dmesg.acpi.disabled
> >> > 
> >> > Any, and I mean any, help on this will be very appreciated.
> >> 
> >> If you can drop into ddb and do a 'show intrcnt' when the machine
> >> locks up that might help fix the hang.  It sounds like the interrupt
> >> routing may not have worked correctly.  Also, a dmesg of acpi
> >> with pci enabled would be helpful.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> 
> >> John Baldwin <>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> >> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
> 
> -- 
> 
> John Baldwin <>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.