Re: Prism54 Chipsets Supported?

Sparrevohn, Thomas writes:

> It reminds me - It seems that the 80211 part of the driver does not support
> "authmode shared" mode? Are there any plans for in support of that? Or are
> that a good reason for the lack of it - e.g. legal etc?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arne Schwabe
> Sent: 30 April 2004 11:10
> To: Patrick Hurrelmann
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Prism54 Chipsets Supported?
> 
> 
> Patrick Hurrelmann <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently using a Dell TrueMobile 1300 (Broadcom) on my Dell 
>> Latitude D600 Notebook. Thanks to Bill Pauls awesome work it is 
>> performs very well for daily und "normal" wireless lan usage.
>>
>> But i want to run some tools, that are only available fo wi-cards. Is 
>> Prism54-Chipset already supported? I read something that a driver for 
>> linux exists on www.prism54.org. will it make it to freebsd or is it 
>> highly unlikely?
>>
>> Some on the lists posted, that he has replaced his card with an 
>> ath-based one. Maybe ath is an alternative to wi, but i'd relly prefer 
>> wi (802.11g or a is a must have).
> 
> I think that the prism54 is not support. But Atheros Chips have a/b/g (They
> were the first a chipsets)
> 
> Arne
> -- 
> Ah, the beauty of OSS. Hundreds of volunteers worldwide volunteering their
> time inventing and implementing new exciting ways of old fashioned  wheels.
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
> 

As far as i remember, a while ago someone pointed out that in fact authmode 
shared is less secure than open mode. So this shouldn't be much of a problem 
:)

--Niki Denev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBAkjXmHNAJ/fLbfrkRAtGUAKCCWkqXiF1FVdNRlxBXN5JOsFo45gCdGcA9
Blv12rVolqoyj7irARf9hZ8=
=DN0Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----