Re: Suitability of Sony VAIO laptop for FreeBSD?
Thomas Beer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I ran 4.x for years on a Vaio PCG-Z600NE serving me well. Ok, audio had a bypass after two years, but that was the only problem. Sony customer service was correct & fast. However, I now switched to IBM. Cheers Tom On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:37:51 -0800 (PST), David Wolfskill <[email protected]> wrote: > Last Saturday, my laptop (a Dell Inspiron 5000e) apparently stopped > working for the last time. (Ugly mode of failure -- won't stay powered > up (even via AC adaptor) to complete a boot sequence; usually doesn't > even get as far as illuminating the screen. I suspect either thermal > stress on the CPU, a crack in teh system board, or bad RAM -- and I > tried swapping the RAM, to no avail.) > > I see that Fry's is advertising a Sony VAIO with the following > characteristics (none of which is a model ID, of course) for $1100: > > * 2.8 GHz P4 CPU > * 15.4" WXGA screen ("TFT With XBRITE Technology") > * 512 MB DDR SDRAM > * 60 GB disk > * CD/RW/DVD-ROM combo drive > * Integrated 802.11g > * 10/100 NIC & v.90 MODEM > * ILink (1394) & Memory stick slot > * Some M$ "software" that I fully intend to ignore > > I suspect that it also has a plausibly reasonable audio component, > though that isn't critical for my primary intended uses. The > illustration that accompanies the ad shows a "touchpad"-type pointing > device, which should serve OK for me. > > I do tend to do a lot of "make buildworld" (and friends) type things on > a laptop; that may have contributed to the demise of the i5ke mentioned > above. > > One of the "scarce resources" that I tend to value in a laptop is screen > "real estate" -- my eyes work reasonably well, and I prefer > higher-resolution screens. The 1400x1050 of the i5ke was OK, but a > little cramped. > > I would expect that with a 2.8 GHz P4, it would suck a battery "dry" > rather quickly; this would be a rather negative attribute. The ad > didn't indicate the number or nominal run-time for batteries. > > Any warnings as far as running FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x (or 6) on such a > beast? > > Thanks! > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill [email protected] > I resent spammers because spam is a DoS attack on my time. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for public key. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"