Re: NFS performance with 10GBase-T

Mark Saad <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <CAMXt9NZYKFnaXLnS10PuARvj2B7oYzd98Y5aExCkhz3cY+HwpQ@mail.gmail.com>
H

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 6:51 PM Rick Macklem <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 1:21 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to
> [email protected].
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 25, 2024, at 01:18, Hannes Hauswedell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I am coming here from
> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2771971160
> > I guess this should read:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277197
> Btw, what Hannes reported in the PR was that performance was
> about the same for Linux and FreeBSD NFS clients when the link
> was using a 1500byte ethernet frames.
> However, Linux performs much better with 9K jumbo frames
> whereas FreeBSD performance does not improve for 9K jumbo
> frames. (Some mount options I suggested did help somewhat
> for FreeBSD. Basically increasing rsize/wsize did help, but he
> still sees performance below what Linux gets when 9K jumbo frames
> are used. (I did note the potential problem of mbuf cluster pool
> fragmentation when 9K jumbo frames are used, although I did not
> intent to imply that this issue is involved, just that it is a known
> deficiency that "might" be a factor.)
>
> rick
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael
> > >
> > > TL;DR:
> > >
> > > * I have a FreeBSD14 Server and Client with an Intel X540 (ix) adaptor
> each.
> > > * I am trying to improve the NFS throughput.
> > > * I get 1160 MiB/s via nc, but only ~200 MiB/s via NFS.
> > > * Increasing rsize and wsize to 1 MiB increases throughput to 395 MiB/s
> > > * But a Linux client achieves 560-600 MiB/s with any rsize.
> > > * The mtu is set to 9000 but this doesn't make a difference for the
> FreeBSD client (it does make a difference for Linux).
> > >
> > > I assume < 400 MiB/s is not the expected performance? Do you have any
> advice on debugging this?
> > >
> > > Thank you for your help,
> > > Hannes
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>  Hannes
   In the dmesg posted I see that you have a epair loaded . Are you trying
to do NFS inside of a Jail ?

Rick, Didn't someone from Isilon or Dell/EMC post about the 9K frames a
long time ago ?  I know in isilon land
their FreeBSD can do this, but I can't say I have any idea how it's being
done. They do have some kernel auto-tune magic as well
to find optimal send and receive buffers. Maybe what we are seeing is Linux
having better ergonomics on buffers out of the box ?

Hannes
  Can you post your boot.conf and sysctl.conf settings.
-- 
mark saad | [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.