Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

Nuno Teixeira <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <CAFDf7UJRitdHz5QebNH9A4mNo0pKCBRfZCfmFgjNVSdCr_JXrw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello all,

On a laptop i7/16MB ram, desktop use and port testing (poudriere) I've
noticed that all operations on OS was increased by 3 to 5 times
longer.
examples:
- firefox took way long time to open
- poudriere testport tooked up to 3 times longer to finished

make.conf:
KERNCONF=GENERIC-NODEBUG
src.conf:
WITH_MALLOC_PRODUCTION=yes

tested on main-n268800-6a6ec90681cf

Thanks,

<[email protected]> escreveu (quinta, 14/03/2024 à(s) 10:51):
>
> > On 14. Mar 2024, at 11:04, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > [email protected] writes:
> >> Gary Jennejohn <[email protected]> writes:
> >>> In the article we have option TCPHPTS and option TCP_RACK.  But in
> >>> /sys/conf/NOTES we have options TCPHPTS and options TCP_RACK and
> >>> not option.
> >> Thanks for reporting, that is a typo in the article. It should
> >> always read options instead of option.
> >
> > It's not a typo, both spellings work, cf. config(5).
> Thank you very much for the hint. I did not know this. I wrote
> option in the article (for whatever reason) and tested the
> configs using options...
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> > DES
> > --
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected]
>


-- 
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD Committer (ports)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.