Re: vnet with interfaces
Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <JmFi-o52yrBHl3afk0W5lzpdRBpXBVPKuOB5lwiGiMQKcU3UPfH4MS1QJClv5p0986gHBIOJm6UfazJxr8dgTe1FeK_IbjJFNTSta55OYSY=@enki-multimedia.eu> |
Thanks for the link! the VIMAGE concept is such an interesting hack.. Benoît Chesneau, Enki Multimedia — t. +33608655490 Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Thursday, March 28th, 2024 at 10:17, Tom Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 18:31, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > > > How does work VNET with interfaces? Is this as efficient as using pci > > passtrough in a vm ? > > > Overhead should be minimal, while the device is logically missing from the default vnet there isn't any more "in the way" for actual usage. Marco's paper might be a good starting point for further digging: https://papers.freebsd.org/2003/zec-vimage/ > > Tom