Re: Source IPv4 address selection vs BGP IX connection

Gregory Shapiro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <3exr7zmcxnfxuofbyf57gdbzxxrgntprydeesbjsparq3xgeri@p4irynwruq7f>
> The mistake your making, IMHO, is that an IX connected eBGP FreeBSD
> router _SHOULD NOT_ be doing ANYTHING other than BGP on the IX
> connected interface, and anything like DNS and outbound SMTP should be
> going inward on the AS, not outward to the internet.

Fair point and thank you for the advice.  I am locking it down to an
extent (denying all inbound ports except 22, 179 from an ipfw table list
of trusted hosts/peers/upstreams/downstreams) but not as tightly as you
suggest as I do use some on-Internet services.  Specifically, port 25 to
my own mail server (not unwashed Internet service, but sitting off of a
different network) for system generated mail (cron, /etc/periodic/ script
output), 53 to admittedly "unwashed" Google DNS, and 123 to
FreeBSD's NTP pool (again "unwashed" to an extent).

I will look at using local instances for the latter two.

I still see value in source IP selection, even outside of the IX use
case.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.