Re: Discarding inbound ICMP REDIRECT by default

Chris <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2024-06-14 05:50, Ed Maste wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 18:05, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> As Rodeney already effectively explains; dropping packets makes routing,
>> and discovery exceedingly difficult. Which is NOT what the average user
>> wants,
> 
> This is on end hosts only, not routers (which already drop ICMP REDIRECT).
> 
>> or expects. I use "set block-policy drop" in pf(4). But as already noted,
>> this is for "filtering" purposes. Your suggestion also has the negative
>> affect
>> of hanging remote ports. Which can result in other negative results by 
>> peers.
> 
> I don't follow -- how does a host not processing ICMP REDIRECT cause
> these effects?
It appears I may have overstated my point here. Dropping redirects isn't
(necessarily) out of line. I was thinking in terms of dropping (all) queries.
Which is wrong in this context. Sorry. :)
Thanks for taking the time to respond.

--Chris
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.