Re: slow network performance in bhyve with freebsd guests compared with any other guest os

Lexi Winter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 29/09/2024 07:58, void wrote:
> Surprisingly, freebsd guest performance is about 1/3rd of the line speed.
> Do some sysctls need to be tuned in freebsd specifically for when it is 
> in a guest context?

i tested this here and cannot reproduce the problem:

1023!ragweed ~% iperf3-darwin -c iris.eden.le-fay.org
Connecting to host iris.eden.le-fay.org, port 5201
[ 18] local 2001:8b0:aab5:c110:ab:f106:1d40:4841 port 57426 connected to 
fd12:8247:3:1::7 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd 
  RTT
[ 18]   0.00-1.00   sec   953 MBytes  7.99 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  1ms
[ 18]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.15 GBytes  9.87 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  1ms
[ 18]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.15 GBytes  9.87 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  2ms
[ 18]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.15 GBytes  9.87 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  2ms
[ 18]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.13 GBytes  9.67 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  1ms
[ 18]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.15 GBytes  9.87 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  2ms
[ 18]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.14 GBytes  9.82 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  1ms
[ 18]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.15 GBytes  9.87 Gbits/sec    0   4.00 MBytes 
  1ms
[ 18]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.15 GBytes  9.85 Gbits/sec   46   3.35 MBytes 
  1ms
[ 18]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.15 GBytes  9.87 Gbits/sec    0   3.44 MBytes 
  1ms
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[ 18]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.2 GBytes  9.66 Gbits/sec   46             sender
[ 18]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.2 GBytes  9.65 Gbits/sec 
receiver

iperf Done.
1023!ragweed ~%

client is macOS, server is FreeBSD 15.0 bhyve guest, VM host is FreeBSD 
15.0 on Ryzen 7 2700X with ix(4) network card, path MTU is 9000.  as you 
can see, it reached close enough to wire speed.

i tested with 1500 MTU and it managed ~4Gbps, which is not great, but 
around what i'd expect (and a lot faster than your test manages).

i am not using tcp_rack or any other TCP stack non-default options.

	regards, liss.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.