Re: per-FIB socket binding
Jamie Landeg-Jones <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dyslexic Fish |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is using FIBs to actually have multi-FIB > forwardig but that very little touches your use case apart from the mgmt > which again can be factored out better (or inversely, factoring out the > forwarding). > > I would honestly know who and how FIBs are still in use today or if they > should be put on a list to be removed for 16 (I assume I might be > surprised). I hope that is a joke! FIBs are a must have for certain routing environments, and forcing them into a VNET jail would add to overheads, and not even work for applications that work with 2 or more FIBs in the same instance!