Re: per-FIB socket binding

Jamie Landeg-Jones <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Organization Dyslexic Fish
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is using FIBs to actually have multi-FIB 
> forwardig but that very little touches your use case apart from the mgmt
> which again can be factored out better (or inversely, factoring out the
> forwarding).
>
> I would honestly know who and how FIBs are still in use today or if they
> should be put on a list to be removed for 16 (I assume I might be
> surprised).

I hope that is a joke! FIBs are a must have for certain routing environments,
and forcing them into a VNET jail would add to overheads, and not even work
for applications that work with 2 or more FIBs in the same instance!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.