[Bug 287135] Large Unix SOCK_SEQPACKET messages do not get truncated

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <[email protected]/bugzilla/> 
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287135

--- Comment #1 from Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> ---
I would be interested why an application wants to use a SOCK_SEQPACKET packet
and also expects message loss when providing a too small receive buffer?
From my understanding SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_STREAM are both reliable.
For me it looks like the description of recvmsg() is missing a differentiation
between SOCK_DGRAM and SOCK_SEQPACKET.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.