Re: Two different places between TCP socket behavior and RFC documents
Tilnel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADvKEf9q-qzpCN0mP5JuNZA1qZLbMe0kf66JMNgPNiTD73sQxA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 5:31 AM Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:35:18 +0800 > Tilnel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd be happy to explain the scenario in more detail. > > Consider the following TCP handshake sequence: > > 1. Socket A sends a SYN segment: <CTL=SYN><SEQ=x> to Socket B, which is in > > the TCP_LISTEN state. > > 2. Socket B transitions to TCP_SYN_RECV and responds with > > <CTL=SYN,ACK><SEQ=y><ACK=x+1>. > > 3. Instead of sending the expected <CTL=ACK><SEQ=x+1><ACK=y+1> to complete > > the three-way handshake, Socket A incorrectly sends > > <CTL=ACK><SEQ=x><ACK=y+1>. According to the RFC, the appropriate response to > > such a malformed ACK should be an empty ACK segment: > > <CTL=ACK><SEQ=y+1><ACK=x+1>. After that, Socket B should either wait for a > > valid ACK or retransmit the SYN-ACK if necessary. However, in FreeBSD’s > > current implementation, a RST segment is sent instead: <CTL=RST><SEQ=y+1>, > > which aborts the connection prematurely. This behavior appears to deviate > > from the RFC guidance and may lead to unnecessary connection resets in edge > > cases. Best regards > > Tilnel > > Did you check it with about ~2 G out of window? That is, your examples above > were about ~200 M different sequence numbers, so that RST could be ignored. > Hi. I just checked it with ACK segment carrying different SEQ, including ~2G out of the window. 1. expect seq=2, actual seq=0x80000001 2. expect seq=2, actual seq=0x80000002 3. expect seq=2, actual seq=0x80000003 4. expect seq=2, actual seq=0x90000000 5. expect seq=2000001 (0x1e8481), actual seq=1 6. expect seq=1, actual seq=2000001 (0x1e8481) All of them, under FreeBSD, give a RST reply. Here is the tcpdump of the first case. A > B: Flags [S], seq 1, win 8192, length 0 0x0000: 4500 0028 0000 4000 4006 0000 7f00 0001 0x0010: 7f00 0001 22b9 22b8 0000 0001 0000 0000 0x0020: 5002 2000 4c6e 0000 B > A: Flags [S.], seq 1643153760, ack 2, win 65535, options [mss 16344], length 0 0x0000: 4500 002c 0000 4000 4006 0000 7f00 0001 0x0010: 7f00 0001 22b8 22b9 61f0 8960 0000 0002 0x0020: 6012 ffff fe20 0000 0204 3fd8 A > B: Flags [.], seq 2147483648, ack 1, win 8192, length 0 0x0000: 4500 0028 0000 4000 4006 0000 7f00 0001 0x0010: 7f00 0001 22b9 22b8 8000 0001 61f0 8961 0x0020: 5010 2000 e10d 0000 B > A: Flags [R], seq 1643153761, win 0, length 0 0x0000: 4500 0028 0000 4000 4006 0000 7f00 0001 0x0010: 7f00 0001 22b8 22b9 61f0 8961 0000 0000 0x0020: 5004 0000 fe1c 0000 Best regards Tilnel > -- > WBR, @nuclight