Re: use of DOCS in port options

void <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports
Message-ID <aLCm9y1oeXAZGEoq@int21h>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 09:37:21PM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote:

>I'm not a portmgr, so this is all my humble opinion:
>Ideally we should strive to separate DOCS and MANPAGES. But sometimes
>the software's buildsystem has a single "docs" switch that controls
>both manpages and html/pdf/etc. generation. In this case I don't go as
>far as decoupling DOCS and MANPAGES and stick with only DOCS.

OK, thanks.

I guess there's not an official way of processing the ports tree to
see what's where? There's a couple of issues, might be near-edge cases,
in that on a for example embedded system one might not want doxygen
or PDFs made. I install docs-everything in a desktop context,
manpages only elsewhere.

--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.