Re: pkg upgrade forgot how to upgrade packages?
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/10/2025 13:22, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 01:09:29PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> The update process works the same as before, but in the log files it looks >> like "pkg upgrade" can't distinguish between updating packages and simply >> installing new ones. >> .... > > I don't know a lot about the "internal workings" of pkg, but I do use it > (as I update systems "frequently"). > > This example may be "interesting," as it shows mostly "upgraded," but in > one case (clamav), it shows a deinstall/install pair: > > Oct 5 11:09:48 bats pkg[1831]: ca_root_nss upgraded: 3.115_2 -> 3.115_3 > Oct 5 11:09:48 bats pkg[1831]: libunistring upgraded: 1.3 -> 1.4 > Oct 5 11:09:51 bats pkg[1831]: pango upgraded: 1.56.1 -> 1.56.4 > Oct 5 11:09:52 bats pkg[1831]: tiff upgraded: 4.7.0 -> 4.7.1 > Oct 5 11:09:52 bats pkg[1831]: clamav-1.4.3_1,1 deinstalled > Oct 5 11:09:54 bats pkg[1831]: curl upgraded: 8.15.0 -> 8.16.0 > Oct 5 11:09:54 bats pkg[1831]: pcre2 upgraded: 10.45_1 -> 10.46 > Oct 5 11:09:55 bats pkg[1831]: clamav-1.4.3_2,1 installed Now I tried to compare more machines and the strange thing is, that sometimes it shows "upgraded" even in the last months and sometimes not. On the host2 at 2025-07-03 the PHP is logged as upgraded, at 2025-08-26 almost everything is deinstalled and installed, then at 2025-09-29 upgraded. Behavior is not consistent across all the machines but is was more "upgraded" on all machines in the past. (just comparing numbers of logged events "installed" / "deinstalled" / "upgraded" in the log files from previous years) examples from this year from 2 hosts host1 https://defuse.ca/b/rVbAE8WaLJ0WkDnwJxtn77 host2 (rfc5424 log format) https://defuse.ca/b/4CESdSDzkxhwngVLsl7Fe9 Kind regards Miroslav Lachman