Re: Extraneous dependencies in bind920

Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

> > > I just noticed that a poudriere build of dns/bind920 is compiling
> > > things like ghostscript and cups.... Is that necessary? Can it be
> > > prevented?
> > 
> > This might help, please test:
> > 
> > make config
> > 
> > DOCS=off
> 
> Apologies for being obtuse, is this part of the poudriere command
> or something done directly in /usr/ports?

This probably can be done in /usr/ports/dns/bind920.

I have not tested all the details, but if poudriere is set up properly,
it should write some entries to:

/var/db/ports/dns_bind920/options

which can be copied to

/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/dns_bind920

to be picked up in the next poudriere run.

> As an aside, I'd like to
> have the man pages, it's the GUI-related material that seems a waste
> since this is for a headless server.

I have not analysed this in full detail, but I'm not sure man pages
and the rest can easily be seperatly build.

> As an aside, quite a few Linux programs seem to have no man page.
> It would be sad if FreeBSD went that route. 

I agree, but this depends on the port and the nitty-gritty details
of the app itself.

-- 
[email protected]         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.