Re: Extraneous dependencies in bind920

bob prohaska <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 10:54:02AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> 
> Years ago, a similar problem (the long time needed to build dependencies for
> documentation) led to the definition of this in our Poudriere setup:
> 
>    OPTIONS_UNSET= X11 GUI CUPS DOCS EXAMPLES NLS

Placed in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf ?
 
> The resulting packages are for headless machines, build is faster, the
> resulting packages are smaller, dependency chain is shorter, install and
> upgrade times are shorter. 

That's what I'm seeking.

> The disadvantage is that many build dependencies
> have different options than in the official repository, so they cannot be
> pre-fetched and must also be built.

Is that another way of saying "Use ports _or_ pkg, not both"?

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.