Re: cad/kicad separate package for older versions

Thank  you Mike :-)

In case of KiCAD additional problem is they constantly change file
formats makes it self-incompatible by design.. just hope it will
change one day :-(

Good news is the fix showed up in the kicad master, just tried and fix
works, 10.0.2 will be out soon :-)

For the time we can bump kicad-devel to:

https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/-/commit/f21aa0db5a34c847f8d654f8ff2b746895aecd90

Thank you for this kicad-devel port, we can simply update commit and
build and test, very convenient :-)

--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 4:30 PM mike new <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> at least for the *-devel ports I do maintain, its not feasible to maintain several versions of a port just in case a newer version has bugs.
>
> If a newer version is released its up to the upstream vendor to provide the proper release management.
>
> The exception is sometimes if mayor incompatibilities affect depent ports like qt5/qt6, ffmpeg, ...
>
>
> Furthermore the *-devel ports are by definition bleeding edge...
>
>
> greetings
>
> ---
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 4/24/26 05:51, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>
> Hello world :-)
>
> The KiCAD port has been updated to version 10.0.1 big thank you!
>
> Except there is a blocker bug in pcbnew that make it impossible to set
> track width as it crashes:
>
> https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/-/work_items/23708
>
> Many people reported this issue, including one from FreeeBSD, but the
> issue is closed without resolution o_O
>
> My question is would it be possible to create a separate package for
> older release of KiCAD in case of such situations so it would be
> possible to fallback to older release in case of current release is
> broken (which happens quite often)? I am aware and don't want to even
> mention that older version may not open newer design files lol.
>
> I have verified with cad/kicad-devel and the issue is still there..
> and I was supposed to start pcb cncing in a few hours o_O
>
> The only quick fix for this is to have older version in a separate package?
>
> Thanks :-)
> Tomek
>
> --
> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
>