Re: why does devel/electron41 show as blacklisted on pkg.f.o
Bugs Beastie <[email protected]> Fri, 29 May 2026 21:20:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
May 29, 2026 21:02:56 Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]>: > On Wed, 27 May 2026 18:01:51 +0200 > Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >>> I do believe they're talking about outsourcing the build process and distributing amongst resources. Like a hive or a chain where distributed systems would be used to build pieces (of the software) and collaborate back (which does have potential to be a great resource.) But, the Poudriere system does not support this currently. Perhaps in the future? >> >> Again: The critical path for a rebuild of the ports tree is >> the longest compile-time path in the dependency tree. >> >> If you throw more CPUs at the problem, the longest path will >> not become shorter. Only if you use CPUs with higher GHz rate. >> >> -- >> [email protected] +49 171 3101372 Now what ? > > What I read from this thread is a bit different. > > Aren't others talking about "Can't be a build for single huge port > to be built distributed?" rather thand "Can't we build more ports > at once?"? > Hi! Well, I can confirm that electron can use 4 real cores, the build than takes around 23 hours! Has anybody experimented with larger number of cores? 32, for example?