Re: why are db5 and pcre being installed as dependencies in pkgs from -current pkg.f.o
void <[email protected]> Sun, 31 May 2026 10:39:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ahwBzgXZ8D2C6M3C@int21h> |
On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 12:44:29PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >On 5/30/26 06:15, void wrote: >> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 09:15:42AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> Note: the above are general comments that suggest the result may not be >>> surprising. I did not analyze the specifics for the timing related to >>> db5 and pcre . >> >> pcre was EoL'd on 2021-06-21 going by >> https://www.pcre.org/original/changelog.txt >> and marked deprecated on 29 Feb 2024 in >> https://www.freshports.org/devel/pcre/ >> >> db5, according to https://www.freshports.org/databases/db5/ >> >> Deprecated: EOLd, potential security issues, maybe use db18 instead >> This port expired on: 2022-06-30 > >The builders do not change what they build until after the ports are >updated, for sure . . . I acknowledge that it's possibly not really an issue in the hobbyist or abstract context. In a more professional context, one would build with options in poudriere. I was surprised to see such affected binaries on pkg.f.o though. --