Re: postfix-3.11.4,1 does not work with lmdb-1.0.0,1, requires 0.93.5,1

David Wolfskill <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Jul 2026 05:10:11 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 11:59:27PM +0000, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson wrote:
> On 7/3/26 11:47 PM, Jordan M wrote:
> ...
> > Can we get databases/lmdb reverted to 0.93.5, and 1.0.0 added as a
> > separate origin?
> > 
> 
> I agree with this. Upgrading lmdb broke both knot3 and bind920 for me. I've
> fixed it by downgrading lmdb in a ports-overlay tree that poudriere uses.
> 
> .einar

For my use cases, the update to lmdb affected mail/mutt and dns/bind920.

However -- in my use cases -- neither was broken.

I suspect that for mutt, the use is for ephemeral caches.  (And in any
case, there was an update to mutt within the last 24 hours.)  And for
bind920, I do not happen to make use of features that actually use lmdb.
(Thanks for the "heads up," though, so I spent a few minutes scanning for
the existence of any possible lmdb files ... and then updated rather
more cautiously than ususal, with a few extra checking steps along the
way.)

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill                              [email protected]

See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 395 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPEEARYKAJkWIQRCec5RsK7Enudh3yGB9MJ9AwUELQUCakpJoxsUgAAAAAAEAA5t
YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDNfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMu
b3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDQyNzlDRTUxQjBBRUM0OUVFNzYxREYy
MTgxRjRDMjdEMDMwNTA0MkQACgkQgfTCfQMFBC2UlgEAyt7NF5BxTLv6qtTL2KjB
RbmPLaWJD7eC1Dp7MgRPHKMA/Rn6bsdBOxH/1vCz47MBXFht2U2UPc916wBsrlO9
BxYK
=JbTp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----