Re: postfix-3.11.4,1 does not work with lmdb-1.0.0,1, requires 0.93.5,1
David Wolfskill <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Jul 2026 05:10:11 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 11:59:27PM +0000, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson wrote: > On 7/3/26 11:47 PM, Jordan M wrote: > ... > > Can we get databases/lmdb reverted to 0.93.5, and 1.0.0 added as a > > separate origin? > > > > I agree with this. Upgrading lmdb broke both knot3 and bind920 for me. I've > fixed it by downgrading lmdb in a ports-overlay tree that poudriere uses. > > .einar For my use cases, the update to lmdb affected mail/mutt and dns/bind920. However -- in my use cases -- neither was broken. I suspect that for mutt, the use is for ephemeral caches. (And in any case, there was an update to mutt within the last 24 hours.) And for bind920, I do not happen to make use of features that actually use lmdb. (Thanks for the "heads up," though, so I spent a few minutes scanning for the existence of any possible lmdb files ... and then updated rather more cautiously than ususal, with a few extra checking steps along the way.) Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill [email protected] See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 395 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPEEARYKAJkWIQRCec5RsK7Enudh3yGB9MJ9AwUELQUCakpJoxsUgAAAAAAEAA5t YW51MiwyLjUrMS4xMiwyLDNfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMu b3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDQyNzlDRTUxQjBBRUM0OUVFNzYxREYy MTgxRjRDMjdEMDMwNTA0MkQACgkQgfTCfQMFBC2UlgEAyt7NF5BxTLv6qtTL2KjB RbmPLaWJD7eC1Dp7MgRPHKMA/Rn6bsdBOxH/1vCz47MBXFht2U2UPc916wBsrlO9 BxYK =JbTp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----