Re: Question about submitting a new FreeBSD port for review
Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:20:46 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports |
|---|---|
| Organization | Junchoon corps |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:56:53 +0200 Kurt Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > > I did not know about phabricator until I read your email so I have added > > my attempts to port software to FreeBSD in Bugzilla (following the > > handbook). > > > > Are the two paths mutually exclusive? > > No. But if you submit to both, add pointers to the other submission. FYI: A pair of example of mine. PR filed on Bugzilla: Noting review (Differential Revision ID) at Comment 1. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=296137 Corresponding review on Phabricator: Noting Bug ID in PR: line of the SUMMARY. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D57655 I'm basically using both when I have patches because not everyone who want to leave comment and/or requests don't have account on both service. There can be GitHub PR (Pull Request), but I don't have (and not planning to have) accounts there. When I don't have patch for fix but want to report issues or some requests, I use Bugzilla or MLs, but not Phabricator. Because Phabricator is for code review. OTOH, I use Phabricator alone when I have patch for fixes (and/or cleanups) but having no (possible) functional changes. This is because NOT to confuse regular users. But if any PR can be found on Bugzilla by some others, I use it instead (unless opening review is requested by interested committers). In special case like trivial fix that seemed to be missed on commits that seems review are unneeded, I usually post comments (with or without patch) on corresponding dev-* ML, CC'ing the author and committer, to make fix done earliest. https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main/2026-July/202103.html Hope these examples help. Regards. > > I am asking since I have noticed that it's kind of difficult to get > > feedback for attempts to create ports. I guess no one has the time to look > > at my feeble and probably horrid attempts to port. > > Yes, that's the main problem. > > > Could I/Should I ask that the PRs in Bugzilla should be closed and revert > > to phabricator? > > > > These are my feeble and horrid attempts: > > > > March 17 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=293877 > > > > April 14 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=294521 > > > > July 8 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=296618 > > The problem is time for commenters/committers, and the submission method > does not fix this problem. > > -- > [email protected] +49 171 3101372 Now what ? -- Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]>