Re: Mac G5 X11 performance

Nice work.  I confirmed that this patch fixes the build on a stock gcc 
4.2 based installation.

Is anyone on this list able to commit it?

On 2019-05-23 19:58, Mark Millard wrote:
> I'm able to build devel/qt5-core based on:
>
> # svnlite diff/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/
> Index: /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk
> ===================================================================
> --- /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk	(revision 501994)
> +++ /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/qt-dist.mk	(working copy)
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
>   .if ${_QT_VER:M5}
>   post-patch: gcc-post-patch
>   gcc-post-patch:
> -	${REINPLACE_CMD} 's|%%LOCALBASE%%|${LOCALBASE}|' \
> +	${REINPLACE_CMD} 's|%%LOCALBASE%%|${LOCALBASE}|g' \
>   		${WRKSRC}/mkspecs/common/gcc-base.conf \
>   		${WRKSRC}/mkspecs/freebsd-g++/qmake.conf
>   	${REINPLACE_CMD} 's|%%GCC_DEFAULT%%|${GCC_DEFAULT}|g' \
>
> I noticed that my build logs had %%LOCALBASE%% text that had
> not been replaced, in particular the 2nd one on a particular
> line. That lead to noticing the missing "g".
>
> (I'm not a ports committer or maintainer.)
>
> I experiment with a system-clang-8 and base/binutils based
> powerpc64 environment, instead of gcc 4.2.1 based. So direct
> inference of others being able to do the same would not
> apply. But it seems likely to me.
>
>
> Side note:
>
> qt-dist.mk sometimes uses -e with ${REINPLACE_CMD} even when
> only one command is being fed to sed, a context in which the -e
> is optional.


-- 
Earth is a beta site.

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"