https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245511
--- Comment #7 from Piotr Kubaj <[email protected]> ---
> I understand, yet if that is an important function of the -devel ports
> for powerpc as well (I certainly see it that way in general), can you
> help test lang/gcc9-devel and push in changes there first before tackling
> lang/gcc9 going forward?
OK.
> Your change does not just affect the compiler binaries themselves, and I
> assume quite a bit, it also pushes -O0 for the target libraries.
I know that, I can already notice that some ports build much slower than before
(but it's just some, most still build in similar time).
Another advantage of building GCC with -O0 seems that some ports now build,
whereas previously the compiled binaries failed during build with segfault.
I had that experience with lang/ghc. It was ported some time ago and built just
fine, but some time ago started failing with segfault during build process. Now
was the first time in a few months that it built. There may be other ports in
similar situation.
> Once my patch is in, can you please give three things a try, one after
> the other?
>
> (1) CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET is really necessary (by removing it)?
> (2) CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET is really necessary (by removing it)?
> (3) For what is left after (1) and (2), is -O1 also sufficient?
OK, I'll test it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.