Re: Introduce WITH(OUT)_LTO? (was: Re: svn commit: r362987 - in head: contrib/bc usr.bin/gh-bc) (LLVMgold.so and gnu's ld.gold)

Mark Millard via svn-src-head <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current.scm,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.toolchain,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ppc
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 2020-Jul-8, at 01:28, Stefan Eßer <se at freebsd.org> wrote:

> Am 08.07.20 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Millard:
>> The following is more informational than anything as far
>> as I'm concerned. But there may be implications that I'm
>> unaware of. (I sometimes experiment with toolchain use
>> to see what the current status is for such use.)
>> 
>> I attempted to build a system for 32-bit powerpc using clang
>> and binutils, building head -r363000 ( from -r363000 ). (This
>> was a cross build, amd64 -> powerpc.) It got a new type of
>> failure, compared to my past experience:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> thank you for the report. I have tested with "make universe" (with
> default settings) that this version builds on all architectures,
> but Ed Maste has already disabled -flto for powerpc64, due to run
> time issues (floating point exception, IIRC).
> 
> I know that you are actively working on PowerPC and I'd appreciate,
> if you could provide me with information on which parameters cause
> breakage and which work for you. The combination of CLANG with LTO
> and GNU binutils cannot work - CLANG and GCC use incompatible file
> formats to represent the intermediate object files.

Hmm. It looks a little more complicated than that . . .

Looks like the devel/llvm80 devel/llvm90 and devel/llvm10
options for powerpc64 include one for:

     GOLD=on: Build the LLVM Gold plugin for LTO

That produces a plugin (LLVMgold.so) for use with gnu's
ld.gold ( from devel/binutils ).

The system-clang/llvm materials do not seem to include
LLVMgold.so and so prevent use of that toolchain for
LTO via devel/binutils . (A FreeBSD choice rather than
a llvm* vs. binutils technically-blocking issue?)

devel/binutils builds and installs /usr/local/bin/ld.gold
for both 32-bit powerpc contexts and for powerpc64 contexts.

However, for the 32-bit powerpc context, the devel/llvm*
do not include an option to enable building LLVMgold.so .
I do not know if this is just a ports choice vs. if this
has a technically-blocking issue involved.


===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.