Re: What's the plan for powerpc64 in FreeBSD 16
Al <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Nov 2025 15:47:38 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.architechture,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ppc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:07:23 +0000 > From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> > To: Minsoo Choo <[email protected]> > Cc: Warner Losh <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: What's the plan for powerpc64 in FreeBSD 16 > > Minsoo Choo writes: > >> After reading replies, I still have questions why we should keep powerpc64be. > >> Second, regarding arguments about keeping big-endian support in codebase even >> if no one actually physically runs the code: >> This also applies to leaving 32-bit code (armv7) in tree for future >> compatibility. > > I think that is a bit of a leap, although in principle I agree. > > However, I am much less convinced that a relevant new 32 bit platform > will appear, than that somebody comes out with a 64 BE platform. > > Bit-rot is a thing, and unless we are willing to say "Screw anybody > silly enough to create BE platform now or in the future" we should > still guard against it. There is a number of new PowerPC 64 BE systems: A1222 Sam460 several versions Mirari (New PPC hardware) Also, https://www.powerpc-notebook.org/en/ I am also told you can still buy X5000s new.