Re: Proposal to switch powerpc64le to IEEE-754 binary128

--RZEOI2jwGHA6Gc3t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 26-06-14 15:48:51, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 at 14:39, Piotr Kubaj <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> > >
> > > Ok. Let's pick a date and give anyone else a chance to speak up before
> > > you pull the lever and commit us to the path!
> > Is next Saturday 20.06 OK?
>=20
> Sure, just keep in mind people will be at BSDCan 2026 :-)
>=20
> Do you have diffs up for the ports? Eg the ports will need to know
> that if they're targeting 15 they should build the old abi, but 16
> after a certain point they should target a different abi?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -adrian

I have some diffs for ports. For some ports, the fix will be applied
to all versions, but for others fixes will have to applied via
EXTRA_PATCHES, based on OS version.

If the patch is OK to commit, can you accept it in Phabricator?

--RZEOI2jwGHA6Gc3t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=GeMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RZEOI2jwGHA6Gc3t--