Re: About ports QA by 'port test'
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:46:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.quality-assurance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:05:31PM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Vladimir and other folks, >=20 > I've just looked at the logs for my ports. It's worth to notice that > portlint gives just wrong results. For example, for devel/boost-jam it > reports the following: >=20 > FATAL: Makefile: PORTVERSION or DISTVERSION has to be there. >=20 > (reported at > http://kemia.me.tut.fi/~chu/FreeBSD.port_tests/devel/boost-jam/test.log) >=20 > However, if you cd to /usr/ports/devel/boost-jam and type "make -V > PORTVERSION", then make prints "1.41.0". The same with MAINTAINER and oth= er > variables reported as missing. >=20 > So don't take the reports too seriously. It's just a reminder to > double-check, not the facts. I wonder if portlint could grow some kind of "ignore these specific warnings and errors" capability, similar to lintian's override list in Debian. I'll have to think about it a bit - maybe the warnings and errors could have a tag, not just a free-text description. I'll think about it a bit longer and then possibly come up with a proposal of some kind, or maybe even prototype code :) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkufi5UACgkQ7Ri2jRYZRVMmCQCgrkMhD4TB7jEuVadlY2xzBJdl s4YAn1M4yY6PfuRe4pX3DUCJ1tHIvTOV =aqtA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--