WWN
Warner Losh <[email protected]> Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:47:27 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.scsi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANCZdfr7u0Emk=+6butKsjAgYcgJhvTZu3rv7X6N6Pozdx7tcA@mail.gmail.com> |
Is there a reason we don't rely primarily on WWN changing to detect a disk change at a particular location? I know it's not universally available, but anything made in the last 15 or 20 years should have one if my research is correct... Or is this just a case of inertia? I'm looking at making ahci a little more resilient to transient outages, and thought it might be best to key primarily off this and secondarily off other changed information when that's not available. If I had a WWN, then I'd know the disk that was gone for 500ms is the same one and I could resume its operations and still detect that someone unplugged drive A and plugged in drive B. Warner