Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda
Jim Thompson <[email protected]> Mon, 29 May 2006 14:11:46 -1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.small |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On May 29, 2006, at 7:49 AM, marty fouts wrote: > On 5/28/06, James Mansion <[email protected]> wrote: >> >Experience suggests that wear leveling does matter in this >> market, but >> >that fairly simple wear leveling can be very effective. >> >> Can I ask why? I mmay be a very bed person to talk about phones, >> because I have a 6-year-old Seimens I chose for battery life and >> the first thing I did was disable IrDa and WAP. It doesn't have >> a camera. ;-) And I've never sent a text. >> > > Two reasons: First, NAND devices have a complicated wear behavior. The > more frequently you hit the same block, the lower the life expectancy > of the block. Uh... 'hit' is 'write', correct? and I don't think its got anything to do with frequency, but hey, I've been wrong before, feel free to correct me. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-small To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"