Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
"M. Warner Losh" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.small |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060131.130524.66709261.imp__37505.1027899191$1138738224$gmane$org@bsdimp.com> |
In message: <[email protected]> Robert Watson <[email protected]> writes: : : On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > Given how intertwingled picobsd is to the underly OS, I think you are going : > to have a hard time getting to #3. #2 is fine with me. : : My feelings here are pretty much the same -- I'm skeptical about the continued : ability to maintain PicoBSD outside CVS in a long-term way, given tight : integration with the source tree. People can and do maintain there own : versions of FreeBSD releases and wrappers (FreeSBIE is presumably the most : successful example), but it's a lot of work, and if there's trouble finding : enough hands for the current PicoBSD, it doesn't seem likely it will get more : hands somewhere else. Our company maintains its own release tools that would fall somewhere between PicoBSD and NanoBSD. We've tried very hard to make them version independent, but it is a constant struggle. Warner _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-small To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"