Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
Dario Freni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.small |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <43DFFF1A.4050406__27106.1543179259$1138753434$gmane$org@freesbie.org> |
Julian Elischer wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[email protected]>, "M. Warner >> Losh" writes: >> >> >>> In message: <[email protected]> >>> Sam Leffler <[email protected]> writes: >>> >> >> >> >>> Since I've started working on the bring up on an ARM based board, I've >>> been wanting something that is easy to work with and that worked. I >>> think it would help us a lot in the embedded space if we had something >>> integrated into the base OS to do this stuff. >>> >> >> I agree. I think we need to be much more inclusive in our concept of >> a 'release' than we are now. >> >> As I see it, PicoBSD with its "additive" approach would cover the >> low-capacity (<32 MB ?) range, NanoBSD with its "subtractive" approach >> takes over from there, FreeSBIE covers the "don't touch my disk" >> range and finally the full blown release as we know it. >> >> > > I'd like to see us take the freesbie release into the tree somewhere > (since it uses so many > ports, maybe in ports, or maybe in tools) > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" Do you mean the livecd or the build toolkit? The toolkit only needs mkisofs as port (like release/ scripts do, afaik). Bye, Dario -- Dario Freni ([email protected]) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD3/8aymi72IiShysRAnCYAKDuLhArEQ2taebuatmLm8/U2vrLggCg2Sjx r5zkVygNMShiZHezUqzgJqk= =6Vus -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----