Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
Julian Elischer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.small |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dario Freni wrote: >Poul-Henning Kamp ha scritto: > > >>In message <[email protected]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: >> >> >>>In message: <[email protected]> >>> Sam Leffler <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>> >>>Since I've started working on the bring up on an ARM based board, I've >>>been wanting something that is easy to work with and that worked. I >>>think it would help us a lot in the embedded space if we had something >>>integrated into the base OS to do this stuff. >>> >>> >>I agree. I think we need to be much more inclusive in our concept of >>a 'release' than we are now. >> >>As I see it, PicoBSD with its "additive" approach would cover the >>low-capacity (<32 MB ?) range, NanoBSD with its "subtractive" approach >>takes over from there, FreeSBIE covers the "don't touch my disk" >>range and finally the full blown release as we know it. >> >> >> > >Actually, FreeSBIE 2 toolkit covers both approaches. It is successfully >used in embedded enviroments. pfSense (www.pfsense.com) use it either >for creating an install livecd as well as embedded images for >soekris-like machines. It can perfectly act as NanoBSD (the only >difference is the partitioning scheme which is trivial to reproduce by >customizing FreeSBIE's image script). > >Nobody of you mind importing the toolkit in the source tree? :) > > on the contrary i thin it should be there.. *somewhere*. the question is, "where?" I thought that's why you have access? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-small To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"