Re: Low perf with smp

"Eric" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp
Message-ID <008001c65825$f3c27700$65fd24c0@Eric>
I know Pete but I downgrad because when installing 6.0 performance was half 
than with 4.11.
I done tests and tests but still have very low perfs. I then downdgrad to 
4.11 to see if it came from hardware or software.
Conclusion is that my test wich is consist of loop of mysql query done by a 
php script take :

             - 32 sec with 4.11 without SMP
            - 54 sec with 4.11 with SMP
            - 62 sec with 6.0 or 6.1 beta 4

That's why actually I'm with 4.11.

If you have any idea how improve perfs with 6.0 it will be a pleasure.
Hardware is new dell 1850 with bi-xeon dualcore 2.8Ghz and scsi 15.000t HDD 
on raid1 perc4si 256Mo  controller.

Eric.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Petri Helenius" <[email protected]>
To: "Eric" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Lucas Holt" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Mark 
Kirkwood" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Low perf with smp


>
> 4.x, SMP and performance don't really live in the same box :-)
>
> Pete
>
>
> Eric wrote:
>> Sorry for time to answer, here is result in both  case (with/withou SMP) 
>> with freebsd 4.11 :
>>
>> kern.timecounter.method: 0
>> kern.timecounter.hardware: i8254
>>
>>
>> If you want I can do new installation with freebsd 6.0
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eric.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Kirkwood" 
>> <[email protected]>
>> To: "Petri Helenius" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Eric" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Lucas Holt" 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 1:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: Low perf with smp
>>
>>
>>> Petri Helenius wrote:
>>>> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As I understand it, when you activate SMP a more accurate, but slower 
>>>>> timecounter is chosen (typically 'i8254' instead of 'TSC' on intel 
>>>>> HW).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ACPI-fast should be the default with SMP. It's significantly faster 
>>>> than i8254
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah - if his Dell has ACPI enabled. However, ACPI-fast is still slower 
>>> than say TSC.
>>>
>>> Eric, do you want to show us the output of
>>>
>>> $ sysctl kern.timecounter
>>>
>>> with and without SMP?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [email protected] mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
> 

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.