Re: RESOLVED : Low perf with smp on DELL server
Mark Kirkwood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eric wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I do a lot new test, re-install all system and arrive now to this : > Test without SMP : 29 sec > Test with SMP : 37 sec > Wich is very far from the 62 sec we have before with SMP and seems to be > "normal" for most people saying SMP and 4.11 are not so friend they > seems to be. Ok for you? > > It seems that problem before, came from perc4 controller configuration. > It seems that if you change configuration on fly you don't have the same > result ;=( as if you re-create the logical drive with good param and > put same param onfly . > Good configuration is for me disable any cache : > On creation and on configuration : Write Policy --> Writethru > Read Policy --> > non-adaptive > Don't know why difference was more important with SMP but it seems to > be now ok. > > As there is still few difference with SMP, I now do same test but > launching 1, 2, or 3 test in same time to see if it's usefulle for me to > have SMP kernel. Result is really near but I doubt that it's not > hardrive that slow down all system. > > Do you know a way to know the hard drive utilisation as with top? > (iostat always return 0) > Do you know a way to do high ramdrive? (I try with mount_mfs but it > always limit me to 400 Mo) > Well done - so you nailed it down to the controller! (chuckles - you might find 6.0 works better than 4.11 with SMP *now*).... With respect to the perc4 not showing up on iostat, could be that 4.11's support for this card is rudimentary - I would suggest starting a new thread asking about this! Cheers Mark _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"