Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
Coleman Kane <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Feb 2007 05:47:55 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20070225054755.GA33858__17301.8262176358$1172385271$gmane$org@ramen.coleyandcheryl> |
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was proclaimed: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote: > > > What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with > > 4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler for > > scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to see what > > the performance improvements of the aforementioned patch were realized to. > > This would likely be a nice graphics for the SMPng project page, BTW... > > There are graphs of this on Jeff's blog, referenced in that URL. > Fixing filedesc locking makes a HUGE difference. > > Kris Thanks. I saw that shortly after I sent the email... /me stupid. How stable is ULE now since the recent swath of rewrites in the past months? -- coleman _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"