Re: NUMA?

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig04B1F0CE10A7FC26DA178441
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Julian Elischer wrote:

> There are other interesting effects too..
>=20
> assigning network interrupts to processors that have good access to the=

> hardware AND the destination if you can..

UMA also seems to be sensitive to topology. While at that, how do you
(if at all) deal with kernel memory allocations with respect to
topology? Things that have their own thread or process is easy but AFAIK
there is a lot of "thread-agnostic" code?




--------------enig04B1F0CE10A7FC26DA178441
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkcnIsACgkQldnAQVacBchNAQCfU4uwKK7l9x5o6lyzGDlOH9xc
XIgAn3pbiYN4tQhvfbP+HolQLW7W7OMd
=PLKz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig04B1F0CE10A7FC26DA178441--