Re: only one logical CPU used in Xeon
John Baldwin <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:55:22 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:28:15 am [email protected] wrote: >=20 > --- On Thu, 3/12/09, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > >=20 > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > >=20 > > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 11:01:51 > > am Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Here's how you can see the details in the demsg > > output: > > > The older machine: > > >=20 > > >=A0 > Features =3D 0xbfebfbff <...,HTT,...> > > >=20 > > > The "HTT" bit in the features bitmask indicates that > > the > > > processor supports hyperthreading. > >=20 > > No, that flag just means it supports a register where you > > can ask for the=20 > > total number of threads/cores per package.=A0 Multi-core > > CPUs that don't have=20 > > hyperthreads have 'HTT' set, but when you read the > > registers properly you see=20 > > that they have 1 thread per core. > >=20 >=20 > Does this mean that the # of logical CPUs per core is not enough to=20 determine whether the machine supports hyperthreading or not? You've said=20 earlier that the newer machine is not hyperthreaded, so I'm assuming that=20 there is another part in the dmesg output that says so. more guidance pls. Your new machine might be hyperthreaded. I'm not really sure as it's a P4 descendant and I'm not sure if Intel released some dual-core P4 Xeon that had 2 threads per core. The current Core processors do not implement multi= ple=20 threads in their cores, but neither of your systems have those CPUs. =2D-=20 John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"