Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64

Craig Butler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.sparc
Message-ID <1579598482.702.1447273490797.JavaMail.craig@w520>

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Linimon" <[email protected]>
> To: "Craig Butler" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "John Baldwin" <[email protected]>, "Anna Wilcox" <[email protected]>, "Marius Strobl"
> <[email protected]>, "Sean Bruno" <[email protected]>, "Jordan Hubbard" <[email protected]>,
> [email protected], "Warner Losh" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 November, 2015 8:22:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:17:32PM +0000, Craig Butler wrote:
> > Just to raise something else as well, port maintainers seem
> > hesitant
> > to push sparc64 fixes in.
> 
> They don't have an effective way to test them.  All they can test for
> is the no-regression case on the hardware they have access to.
> 
> mcl
> 

Can we as a Tier 2 community build them something ??

CB
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.