Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64
Mark Linimon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20151117092703.GA30582__38813.4951856502$1447762831$gmane$org@lonesome.com> |
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:06:35AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > We don’t have a “king of the kernel” or “king of mips” or anything > like that. We document that you send mail to mips@ when you don’t > know the right person to send. And I don't see why we should. What would we gain from this administrative overhead? What we lose is: dealing with people who have the title not doing work, or people not having the title, doing the work, being irritated by not having the title. svn can, with a little effort, demonstrate who is looking after what. All I see is cost and no benefit. This isn't an "org chart" kind of issue IMHO. In FreeBSD, why delegate responsibility to anyone other than those who take it by their own initiative? mcl _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"