Re: Sparc64 and FreeBSD 13.0
John Baldwin <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:55:08 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/4/19 7:58 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:34:46PM -0600, Joe Kozak wrote: >> I put my vote of support in for someone doing some updating if >> possible. > > Unfortunately it doesn't work like that in volunteer projects. > > I estimate it would take 1-3 months to fix the toolchain -- which > would only save us the existing systems (manufactured up to 2005). > When I last looked at sun4v (the newer systems) I estimated 3-5 > months. > > That's full-time activity from someone who *used* to do systems > work, but has not for many years, and would have to come up to > speed on 18 zillion things. > > mcl > > (fwiw I am a software engineer, ergo, my estimates suck.) Fixing the toolchain is probably less than 1-3 months. I have a freebsd-gcc9 port that I haven't posted for review yet, but it hits the same snag (assertion failure in ld.bfd) that freebsd-gcc6 hits. I think the assertion failure is wrong and needs to use >= instead of >, but I just haven't sat down and looked at it in a debugger to see the exact values at the time of the assertion failure. However, I think even once you get it building there might be a few more bumps with getting things like PCPU_* working in the kernel correctly. I probably won't get to it anytime soon, and sparc64 really needs multiple active folks to keep it viable. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"