Re: your mail
Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACvgo51oxBFGBmVAzOVgJ8mbj8zZ+sr1VmEAr+-n7LAB-aQeeQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Niclas, On 15 May 2018 at 09:07, Niclas Zeising <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/15/18 00:47, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> On 22 February 2017 at 14:46, Matthew Rezny <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It has been my intent to upstream as much as possible, but I was trying >>> to get >>> us caught up to current before doing so. >> >> >> Any idea what happened to this? >> >> Earlier I joined the #freebsd-xorg channel, yet it seems fairly inactive. >> Repeating some of my questions here, hope anyone can shed some light: >> >> - How does FreeBSD handle loading of kernel DRM/GPU modules? >> Is there a daemon of sorts, manually or via hacking the graphics stack >> - Xorg/xf86-video*/etc >> >> - ^^ creating /dev nodes >> >> - How capable is your sysfs compat? Or more importantly how frowned >> upon it is to use it on FreeBSD? >> >> And an extra one: >> - How does one contribute patches to (say the graphics - libdrm/mesa/etc) >> ports? >> Is there some instructions and CI there I can throw some patches at? >> > > Hi! > Thank you for your mail and thanks for reaching out! I was one of the ones > responding on IRC, unfortunately you caught me at a bad time here, hence my > suggestion to send an e-mail. > > I know the FreeBSD graphcis effort have been somewhat dormant (yeah, that's > an understatement), but I'm working on getting it going again with a group > of people. It's still in the early stages but hopefully something will come > out of it. We had such a team about 4 or 5 years back, but people, > including myself, got different priorities (you know, life happens). > Glad to hear there's plans on reviving it. > Currently, we have a working area and development repos on gitub, which you > can find here https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/, amongst other things > there's a fork of the FreeBSD ports repo there where most ports development > happens. There's no problem getting you access to that one, and we can also > add forks of upstream mesa and drm repos and so on. Since I'm not using/testing FreeBSD I'm looking for someone to review any patches ;-) Having commit access is not really required on my end. > We also have a gitter > chat that we're trying out. It can be found here: > https://gitter.im/FreeBSDDesktop/Lobby, you're welcome to join there as > well. It's connected to github. The IRC channel #freebsd-xorg is > unfortunately somewhat dormant, because not everyone hangs out there, but > I'm available there as well. > Ack. Will do in a moment. > As I said, we're still early in the process, so all details aren't 100% set > yet, but this is what we have going for now. > > Now, to your questions. As far as I know, there's no automatic loading of > the graphics modules, apart from the really old stuff. If memory serves me > correctly. The current way of doing it is to load the module before > starting X, usually as part of the boot process. There might be a hack in > xf86-video-intel to load some modules, but not the latest kms graphics > modules. > To load the module, currently there are hacks in xf86-video-{intel,ati,amdgpu} and perhaps others. See my patch removing one [1], there extra reasoning in the thread and complete silence from the FreeBSD author ;-( [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2018-April/020935.html > Creating /dev nodes is handled automatically by devfs and devd. I don't > know how it's done in detail, but it's automatic as far as at least I'm > concerned. > Ack. On Linux the same daemon (udevd in our case) loads the kernel module also creates the node. Has there been attempts/discussions about doing the same in FreeBSD? > As for sysfs, mmacy gave a good responce on IRC. > Are you sure it wasn't on gitter? You're the only person who wrote in the IRC channel since I joined. Can you please copy it here or share a link? > For patches and contributing, as I said, we're trying to set up shop on > github (and from there merge into FreeBSD SVN repos). The kernel bits > (what's called drm-next sometimes) are already there, and I've started > working on a ports repo there as well. That's probably the best place to > start. We don't have a CI setup currently, I use the package building > system poudriere locally on my desktop. I can help you get started with > both poudriere and the FreeBSD ports system, and I can also help with adding > patches to the ports and build packages for testing. > I hope to be able to add more automatic building and some sort of CI > solution in the future, but this is where we're at today. > Future looks good, fingers crossed it shouldn't take too long to reach. > We already have some local patches, they should be upstreamed, but I haven't > had time to work through them, and since I don't know exactly how they work, > it will take some time to get them upstream. > Can I contact you directly to get them upstreamed once they're ready? > In general I'd recommend two things: - send patches upstream _alongside_ the FreeBSD submission Either the submitter or reviewer can do that. You want that to avoid redoing the same work multiple times. - contact the project itself, not individuals You can CC individuals, but having only one person is back since the review comments may be partial or outright wrong. > Once again, thank you very much for reaching out, and thank you for reading > to the end! Thanks for taking the time to right this. I'll see about opening a PR or two on FreeBSDDesktop. Fingers crossed it will flow smoothly and get into the official repos quickly. -Emil _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"