Re: [RFC] Deprecation and removal of the drm2 driver

Ian FREISLICH <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Johannes,

On drm-stable Xorg no longer crashes on the first execution of Firefox, 
so that's an improvement.

FWIW (and not to start a bikeshed discussion) stable in the context of 
FreeBSD has meant ABI stability, not crash-free.  If you're going to 
rename the ports, I'd suggest "drm" and "drm-devel".

Ian

On 05/21/2018 03:30 PM, Johannes Lundberg wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Ian FREISLICH 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Niclas
>
>
>     On 05/18/2018 01:58 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>
>         [ Cross posted to freebsd-current@ and freebsd-x11@. Please
>         respect reply-to and send all replies to freebsd-x11@.  Thanks! ]
>
>
>         Hi!
>         I propose that we remove the old drm2 driver (sys/dev/drm2)
>         from FreeBSD.  I suggest the driver is marked as deprecated in
>         11.x and removed from 12.0, as was done for other drivers
>         recently.  Some background and rationale:
>
>         The drm2 driver was the original port of a KMS driver to
>         FreeBSD. It was done by Konstantin Belousov to support Intel
>         graphics cards, and later extended by Jean-Sébastien Pédron as
>         well as Konstantin to match what's in Linux 3.8.  This
>         included unstable support from Haswell, but nothing newer than
>         that.
>
>         For quite some time now we have had the
>         graphics/drm-stable-kmod and graphics/drm-next-kmods which
>         provides support for modern AMD and Intel graphics cards. 
>         These ports, together with the linuxkpi, or lkpi, has made it
>         significantly easier to port and update our graphics drivers.
>         Further, these new drivers cover the same drivers as the old
>         drm2 driver.
>
>         What does the community think?  Is there anyone still using
>         the drm2 driver on 12-CURRENT?  If so, what is preventing you
>         from switching to the port?
>
>
>     I'm running -CURRENT on all my systems.  I have a "3rd Gen" HD
>     Graphics 4000 that I'm running drm-next on but I'm about to revert
>     to drm2 because of instabilities.  Xorg spontaneously crashes, and
>     doesn't on drm2. I also have a Haswell system running drm2 which I
>     have not tried drm-next because SWMBO is particularly intolerant
>     of stuff not working.
>
>
> If drm-next-kmod is causing issues, please try drm-stable-kmod. (we 
> should really rename drm-next to drm-unstable/beta..)
>
>
>     I also ran drm-next successfully on a Sunrise Point-LP system with
>     "Intel UHD Graphics 620" because drm2 didn't support the graphics
>     chip before switching to linux to get the trackpad and sound working.
>
>     I guess the situation is that your mileage may vary depending on
>     your system.  I'm OK with installing drm2 from ports, but at this
>     point I'm not really OK with loosing drm2 at this stage because of
>     the instability in drm-next on my one system.
>
>     Ian
>
>     -- 
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list
>     https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
>     <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>
>     To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>     "[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>"
>
>

-- 
Ian Freislich
+1 404 574 0228


-- 

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.