Re: Mesa compiler specification
Jan Beich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kevin Oberman <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:33 PM Tobias Kortkamp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 21:20, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > I am happy to see mesa-18.3.2 has made it to ports. Thanks, Jan. >> > >> > I do have one question/request... Can the mesa ports be updated to allow >> > compilation with either llvm60 or llvm70? I have been compiling with >> llvm70 >> > fora few weeks with no problems. It both compiles and runs fine. It was >> the >> > only remaining port on my system requiring llvm60 and I suspect that I am >> > not alone in this. >> >> You can do this by simply setting MESA_LLVM_VER=70 in make.conf. >> > > Thanks but it is not really the proper way to solve the problem. This is > something that should "just work" and not require figuring out what needs > to be added to make.conf. At least a note in a pkg-message would help. DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=70 (already default) syntax would apply to mesa-dri after v2 in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230789 lands. Once devel/llvm80 appears it'd be time to prepare for LLVM_DEFAULT bump, patching consumers and asking port maintainers for feedback until actual release happens. Based on results consumers not ready would be temporarily kicked out from LLVM_DEFAULT train, or maybe someone provides a better idea. llvm80 stabilization is partially dependent on how much help clang800-import effort receives. Note, LLVM_DEFAULT is defined in Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"