Re: sc vs. vt ?
Niclas Zeising <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/25/19 5:52 AM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Hello: > I have a system running: > > FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r343080 amd64 > > using "kern.vty=vt" and drm-legacy-kmod. > I start X (using xf86-video-ati) and find: > > [711318.644] (II) LoadModule: "scfb" > [711318.644] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module scfb > [711318.644] (II) UnloadModule: "scfb" > [711318.644] (II) Unloading scfb > [711318.644] (EE) Failed to load module "scfb" (module does not exist, 0) > > and > > [711318.648] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms > [711318.648] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa > [711318.648] (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) > [711318.648] (--) using VT number 9 > [711318.658] (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported. > > Anyone know what's going on, and how I fix it? > > Hi! Can you verify that the kernel module from drm-legacy-kmod is actually loaded and attaches to a graphics card? When you are using drm-legacy-kmod you usually need xf86-video-ati-legacy, rather than xf86-video-ati. Regards -- Niclas _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"