[Bug 239630] x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp()
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239630
Bug ID: 239630
Summary: x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp()
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Keywords: patch
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Flags: maintainer-feedback?([email protected])
Assignee: [email protected]
Attachment #206257 maintainer-approval?([email protected])
Flags:
CC: [email protected]
Created attachment 206257
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=206257&action=edit
v1 (has commit message)
SHM_ANON is faster and more similar to memfd_create(). Not bothering to
upstream because futex/mksotemp fixes didn't get any feedback after 2 years.
Patchwork is complete crap for one-off contributors i.e., those humble enough
to not annoy everyone on patch maillist why their contribution wasn't reviewed
yet.
libxshmfence is only used by DRI3, so make sure to define LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE via
environ(7) due to drm-legacy-kmod hacks in mesa-dri and if using
xf86-video-intel add Option "DRI" "3" to xorg.conf.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"