Re: llvm90 -why
Jan Beich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vasily Postnicov <[email protected]> writes: > вс, 22 сент. 2019 г., 13:25 ajtiM via freebsd-x11 <[email protected]>: > >> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 12:22:21 +0200 >> Jan Beich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > ajtiM via freebsd-x11 <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> > > Hi! >> > > >> > > Mesa-dri is updated and needs llvm90. It is okay. But libosmesa >> > > needs llvm80. Now I have llvm60, llvm80 and llvm90 and and each one >> > > needs a lot of time to build. >> > > >> > > pkg info -r llvm80 >> > > llvm80-8.0.1.: >> > > libosmesa >> > >> > I didn't notice, and poudriere doesn't catch such issues. >> > Fixed in https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/512572 >> >> Thank you. > > What's worse, lang/clover was not updated and still seems to require > llvm80, but devel/libclc now depends on llvm90. This breaks OpenCL on amd > cards completely lang/clover doesn't build with llvm90, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/P294 I'm relying on users' feedback as the maintainer didn't help test bug 239682. Can you document OpenCL error for posterity? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"